The following contains spoilers for Lilo & Stitch, now playing in theaters

23 years after the original animated movie was released, Disney's new live-action Disney remake, the film is coming shortly after Snow White proved to be an extremely disappointing release, having struggled at the box office while facing poor responses from critics and audiences. Lilo & Stitch has enjoyed a much greater reception, especially when ing for its $340 million global opening weekend.

As much as Lilo & Stitch's positive Rotten Tomatoes score suggests the remake has earned the love of audiences, it still falls short of matching the original movie's critical success. It may be a good movie when taken in its own right, but it hardly compares to the original counterpart. This live-action adaptation is unfortunately worse than the animated version in a few key ways that could have a massive impact on its reputation.

8 The CGI Is Not Especially Convincing

Animation Was A Better Medium For This Story

Jumba is reacting to his sentencing in Lilo & Stitch
Custom Image by Yailin Chacon

It is difficult to deny that the CGI for Stitch is downright adorable. The cuddly blue alien appears life-like but still maintains the expressiveness that made him so beloved in the 2002 movie. There was certainly a risk that Stitch could appear too monstrous, but the movie thankfully avoided that trap. It did not, unfortunately, manage to achieve that balance with the movie's other aliens.

Jumba and Agent Pleakley, for instance, are utterly horrifying. When they do not appear to be eerie animatronics at a Disney theme park, they look like skin suits or glued pieces of plastic. It is jarring, especially when viewers are thrown from the adorable Stitch to the much more terrifying Jumba and Pleakley. It could explain the decision to have them disguise themselves as humans, even aside from Lilo & Stitch's initial budgetary concerns.

7 Jumba And Agent Pleakley Are Mostly In Human Form

They Also Never Wear Women's Clothing

Pleakley (Billy Magnussen) and Jumba (Zach Galifianakis) in Lilo & Stitch (2025)

Image via Disney

Much of the original Lilo & Stitch was dedicated to the misadventures of Dr. Jumba and Agent Pleakley. While Jumba cared little for humanity, Pleakley was dedicated to protecting the Earth's most precious resource: mosquitos. In order to prevent himself from disrupting them or their fellow species, he ensured that they always disguised themselves. While Jumba dressed as a human male, despite looking entirely alien, Pleakley always dressed like a human woman.

That ongoing joke is completely removed in the live-action adaptation. Pleakley dresses like a typical human man, and he also has a perfect disguise. The visual humor of two aliens pretending to be human beings through wigs and clothing alone are completely stripped from the movie. It is difficult to understand why Disney made that decision, though the budget likely explains the human disguises, at least. Either way, the characters could still have worn women's clothing, though Disney was likely hoping to avoid courting controversy.

6 Bubbles Is Not As Mysterious

He Becomes A CIA Agent With No Knowledge Of Aliens

Courtney B. Vance with a phone as Cobra Bubbles in Lilo & Stitch

In the original movie, Cobra Bubbles was a social worker and a former CIA agent who had already encountered aliens before. It made him both a mysterious character and an asset to Lilo and Nani, who would otherwise have been entirely alone. It also made him a more grounded character, even as he made it very evident he was looking out for Lilo's best interests.

Actor

Role

Chris Sanders

Stitch (voice)

Maia Kealoha

Lilo Pelekai

Sydney Agudong

Nani Pelekai

Courtney B. Vance

Cobra Bubbles

Kaipo Dudoit

David Kawena

Zach Galifianakis

Dr. Jumba Jookiba

Billy Magnussen

Agent Pleakley

Tia Carrere

Mrs. Kekoa

Hannah Waddingham

Grand Councilwoman

The live-action adaptation attempted to change Bubbles by portraying him as an active CIA agent who pretends to be a social worker. The most compelling element of his character was that he truly cared about Lilo and wanted the best for her and Nani alike. By having him be a generic CIA agent, it strips away that motive, along with some of his whimsy. It is altogether a poor and disappointing change.

5 Jumba Lacks Any Nuance

He Becomes A One-Note Villain

Jumba and Pleakley in Lilo & Stitch (2025)

Image via Disney

Dr. Jumba was originally a corrupt, mad scientist who yearned to create the most evil life-form imaginable. As much as he enjoyed creating chaos, however, he was far more interested in the limits of Stitch's abilities. Once Stitch began to develop empathy, he went through a redemption arc and even went so far as to assist Stitch in his mission to protect Lilo.

Related
I Can't Believe What Lilo & Stitch's Live-Action Remake Did To Jumba

The live-action Lilo & Stitch remake has made a lot of changes, but the worst change that the movie made has to do with Jumba's character.

11

In the live-action adaptation, Jumba is nothing more than a villain. It is one of the most controversial Lilo & Stitch changes, because it was entirely unnecessary. The nuance behind Jumba's character was what made him interesting, and the rest of the cast ultimately embraced him. He even went on to Lilo's family originally. In this version, he is nothing more than a tired and cliché villain with shaky motivations and not even a hint of realism.

4 Gantu Was Cut From The Movie

The Original Movie's Villain Does Not Appear At All

 Kevin Michael Richardson as Gantu looking furious in the original Lilo & Stitch

The shark-like Captain Gantu was originally the main villain of Lilo & Stitch. He was a large and ominous presence, who relied on brute force to take down his enemies. The gigantic villain served as a major enemy for Stitch, as it was his responsibility to capture the alien and bring him back to the Galactic Federation.

Gantu was originally played by voice actor Kevin Michael Richardson.

Despite having such an important role in the story, Captain Gantu was completely removed from the movie. His absence left a void that Jumba was forced to fill, which is part of the reason behind Jumba's lack of any nuance. Gantu's design is likely why he was cut, as it would be difficult to translate into live-action, but his exclusion severely hindered the narrative progression. As difficult as he was to budget for, Gantu was crucial to the third act, and his exclusion was a bizarre twist.

3 Lilo's Connection To Her Parents Is Gone

The Rain Ritual Loses Its Meaning

Lilo (Maia Kealoha) and Stitch laughing, hiding under a table in Lilo & Stitch (2025)

Image via Disney

To some extent, the new movie does not entirely understand Lilo's character. While she is as chaotic as Stitch and as rudderless as any little girl can be, she is an emotional, extremely intelligent young girl who deeply misses her parents. After all, Lilo and Nani's parents died in a car crash on a rainy day, and Lilo carries that with her wherever she goes.

That subtle connection is never revealed to new viewers, and that exclusion just makes this movie worse.

In the original movie, Lilo attempts to honor Pudge the fish, who she believes can control the weather. In doing so, she ensured that similar incidents could never happen again, so her family would remain safe. The movie, however, never mentions how her parents died, which makes the Pudge scene lose its impact. That subtle connection is never revealed to new viewers, and that exclusion just makes this movie worse.

2 Lilo's Temper Is Neutered

Her Over-The-Top Responses Are Toned Down

Lilo and Stitch sitting together at a beach table and looking up at David

Just as Lilo loses her emotional weight, the live-action adaptation also fails to properly portray Lilo's temper. The animated Lilo is introduced as a fiery character who begins to ferociously attack another girl shortly after her debut, just because the girl called Lilo "crazy" for feeding Pudge peanut butter. Lilo strikes her impulsively, and she faces genuine consequences for her actions.

Related
Lilo & Stitch Soundtrack Guide: Every Song & When They Play

The new Lilo & Stitch brings fresh elements to the beloved story, but one way it doesn't deviate from the original is in the pop-centric soundtrack.

1

In the 2025 movie, however, that fierce attack loses all weight. Instead, Lilo does little more than shove the other girl, so it has little long-term impact. Her impulsivity is therefore restricted, making her a less chaotic character. Given that she and Stitch are supposed to be parallel characters, that means that the movie fails to properly portray that theme at all.

1 The Ending Destroys The Movie's Themes

Ohana Means... Leaving Family Behind?

Nani (Sydney Agudong) playing ukulele for Lilo (Maia Kealoha) in a hammock in Lilo & Stitch (2025)

Image via Disney

The most disruptive element of the movie is Lilo & Stitch's controversial ending. Instead of using found family to help Lilo and Nani, Disney made the bizarre decision to leave Lilo with Nani's friendly neighbor. Nani then proceeds to leave Hawaii entirely, moving away to California to pursue a collegiate Marine Biology program.

David's grandmother, Tūtū, becomes Lilo's foster parent.

Despite emphasizing that "ohana means family, and family means no one gets left behind," Nani seems perfectly willing to leave Lilo behind. It is a bizarre decision for a Lilo & Stitch adaptation, especially given that Hawaii already has excellent Marine Biology programs. The original movie kept the two sisters together, which was a far more heartwarming ending, as opposed to Nani leaving Lilo and Stitch behind.

01598630_poster_w780.jpg

Your Rating

Lilo & Stitch
Release Date
May 21, 2025
Runtime
108 Minutes
  • Headshot Of Maia Kealoha
    Maia Kealoha
    Lilo
  • hEADSHOT of Chris Sanders
    Chris Sanders
    Stitch (voice)